Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Chinjut 3911 days ago
How is it off-topic? The comment Zikes was originally replying to is about users' trust in Facebook, and Zikes' comment is a notable (albeit long ago) quote from the founder of Facebook about users' trust in Facebook.
2 comments

(Sorry, I meant to add an explanatory sentence and got distracted. One moment please.)

It's because this is a classic rage tangent, and those invariably reproduce the same result.

People exhume this quote at every opportunity as if it adds light to the topic at hand. But this is an optical illusion: it only appears to do so because it's the most cherry-picked detail ever. All it really adds to the discussion is a rage supplement, like one of those toxic fuel additives.

If you picked a bad thing I—or any of us—said, and brought it out at every apparently relevant moment, you could make me—or any of us—look just as bad. The only differences are that the horrible things I said at 19 have been forgotten (at least I hope they have) and I didn't turn into the CEO of Facebook or some other celebrity.

These single-purpose memes are a side-effect of how the Internet works (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9722096). They're reflexive, not reflective, so they don't belong in HN discussions.

I do feel like it removes a rather important piece of context around my posting of the quote. Whereas before it was an additional point about the sentiment of general user trust in Facebook, now it stands as an attempted jab amidst the dogpile of tinfoil hattery.
That's why we link to the original parent: so anyone who wants to see the original context can.