[ahomescu1]

1. and 2. are OK points, but your point 3. is atrocious. In my opinion, destructive behavior isn't really a legitimate form of protest, and as rubidium wrote, you'd be hurting people who are innocent in all this.

[mindslight]

The scenario I alluded to:

1. A student views leaked documents on a university computer.

2. They inform an SCI wanker of their recent academic pursuit.

3. University knuckleheads decide to destroy the equipment and do so.

At which step does harm occur, and who's behavior is destructive?