|
|
|
|
|
by david_ar
3903 days ago
|
|
Not really, Nash equilibria aren't necessarily the best outcome for any individual (cf the prisoner's dilemma). Cooperation is usually better than every-man-for-himself for everyone involved, hence why social animals evolve altruistic traits. Of course, selfishness works at the expense of an altruistic majority, but that's why people don't like to associate with psychopaths |
|
In most actual real life situations you can get far ahead by behaving as a sociopath.
>Of course, selfishness works at the expense of an altruistic majority, but that's why people don't like to associate with psychopaths
The thing is that as a sociopath you don't even have to show that you are that to people. You can still pretend to be altruistic (to your advantage) and still push your personal agenda whenever possible covertly.