> "The big problem with Xerox is they only wanted to make billions. And that's the problem with most companies. When you're doing kind of stuff you're actually in the trillion-dollar range."
The quantity of world-changing tech that came out of the late 70's has never been matched. In fact it's hard to come up with more than a handful of innovations in tech of the same magnitude that have happened since. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/432922/significant-new-in...
The World Wide Web. Yep, plenty of antecedents, I personally start with Vannevar Bush's Memex for the idea, and there were many attempts with varying levels of un-success, until Tim Berners-Lee put together a winning, massively network effects positive solution.
Which, along with search engines, have resulted in significant, qualitative changes in information publishing and access; in the '70s (or perhaps earlier) Jerry Pournelle was looking forward to the day when you could quickly find the answer to any question that had an answer, and this is one of the biggest steps towards that.
General-purpose technologies (GPTs) are technologies that can affect an entire economy (usually at a national or global level). GPTs have the potential to drastically alter societies through their impact on pre-existing economic and social structures. Examples include the steam engine, railroad, interchangeable parts, electricity, electronics, material handling, mechanization, control theory (automation), the automobile, the computer, and the Internet.
This was the step that made the Internet into a "monster". So even if it only counts as one invention, it's as big as many of those preceding GPTs.
I think the revision of the NSFNet AUP in 1994 (?) to allow commercial use, and the decommissioning of the NSFNet in 1995, was what made the internet into a "monster". Even if people were "only" running NNTP, email, and anonymous FTP, the internet would have taken off massively at that point. This was obvious to me from the time I joined the internet in 1992.
Everything except sovereignty, and some of them are pretty good at working around that.
I'm actually sort of surprised that a company hasn't just "bought out" one or more of the smaller countries -- paying off the citizens to renounce their citizenship, say. It would be easier if you bought two, so as to avoid creating a bunch of stateless people -- pay Country A to grant citizenship to everyone in Country B, and pay the citizens of Country B to renounce their Country B citizenship. You now have Country B to run as you please.