[briandear]

Dishonest marketing? Really? Homebrew, a free tool was out spreading lies about MacPorts? That's ridiculous. When pretty much every major Ruby shop uses Homebrew, why would I want to kick around with MacPorts? I trust Thoughtbot, Pivotal, etc, far more than the two guys actually using MacPorts. Perhaps Homebrew 'won' in that particular community because it was better, ever considered that? Wide community adoption is a far bigger incentive to use a tool over potentially trivial conceptual disagreements.

[teacup50]

> Dishonest marketing? Really? Homebrew, a free tool was out spreading lies about MacPorts? That's ridiculous.

Ridiculous? Homebrew's marketing tagline was "MacPorts driving you to drink? Try homebrew!". The (obviously uninformed) slams of MacPorts and Fink didn't stop there.

It was the first time I'd ever seen negative marketing against a competing OSS project.

> When pretty much every major Ruby shop uses Homebrew, why would I want to kick around with MacPorts?

That wasn't the case then, was it?

> I trust Thoughtbot, Pivotal, etc, far more than the two guys actually using MacPorts.

Yes, this is the kind of specious negative marketing Homebrew specialized in.

> Perhaps Homebrew 'won' in that particular community because it was better, ever considered that?

Sure, I considered that. Then I objectively reviewed Homebrew's claims.

[shadowmint]

> obviously uninformed...

Perhaps you never didn't use macports or fink a few years back?

They were terrible.

Perhaps, now, they're slightly better, but there was a time about oh... 2 years ago, when macports specifically actually made me want to punch my computer.

I can't speak for anyone else, but I can say, that for me, personally, every complaint leveled against them was absolutely spot on.