|
|
|
|
|
by bradleyjg
3917 days ago
|
|
Eight restaurants reviewed in Queens in twenty years. If Queens were its own city, it'd be the fourth largest in the nation -- just ahead of Houston and not far behind Chicago. Maybe they should rename it The Manhattanite, or maybe The Manhattanite, Preferably Below 14th Street. |
|
If you slice off the more residential areas, of course you'll wind up with a big population with a smaller level of cultural activity, because cultural activity is often concentrated away from residential areas: people commute from Queens to Manhattan, and then they stay there to eat/drink. That's an oversimplification that doesn't apply to everyone... but that's the broad pattern.
For reference, according to http://a816-restaurantinspection.nyc.gov/RestaurantInspectio... Manhattan has about twice as many eateries as Queens. But that doesn't tell the whole picture, because a greater proportion of those Queens eateries are likely to be neighbourhood places, diners, delis: places that the New Yorker is obviously not going to review.
So yeah, there's probably some bias... but destination restaurants are concentrated in Lower Manhattan. That's the way it is. You should expect New Yorker reviews to reflect that.