|
|
|
|
|
|
by Stratoscope
3923 days ago
|
|
|
"contains no supports" (was "contains to supports") Funny thing is on first reading, I didn't notice that at all and read it the way you meant. I only saw the typo on a second reading. Interesting autocorrect the brain does. In any case I like your Arch Fallacy! I think I will use it. |
|
|
I'll use it too, it's great and I don't recall any term for that particular error in thinking. I've already started spreading it (the name, not the error) among friends, hoping it will catch on.