|
|
|
|
|
|
by muuh-gnu
3913 days ago
|
|
|
> You might do more than just disagree. He didnt do more than just claim it. > You might supply some reasons why you think Scheme isn't a Lisp. So you want a negative proof without providing a positive proof first? > That would make a much more informative post. So why didnt you remind the previous poster of this, instead of reminding me? |
|
|
I replied to you because, while an unsupported claim is regrettable, an unsupported denial takes you all the way into "Is too! Is not!" 5-year-old-style argument. iak8god started down that road; your reply went further down it.
It also seemed to me that your attitude was sharper than iak8god's. Your reply to me did not change that opinion.
> So you want a negative proof without providing a positive proof first?
Yes. I want you to try to be better than the person you're replying to, rather than trying to be at least as bad.