|
|
|
|
|
|
by vancan1ty
3925 days ago
|
|
|
"Take a look at the link I included in my original post, which shows 108 commits in jdt.core just in the last month." You need to take another look at the timeframe for that statement. The link (http://git.eclipse.org/c/jdt/eclipse.jdt.core.git/stats/?per...) in your original post shows 15 commits so far in September, not 108 as you claim. The 108 figure is total commits since the beginning of June. |
|
|
You're right that the number of commits in September is down, but the trend line in the months preceding September is pretty stable and represents a healthy project that is on track to deliver Java 9 support in September 2016 (and that's what is really important, right?)
The project lead has taken some time out of his busy schedule to capture down an explanation for the anomaly in the commit chart.
https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/jdt-ui-dev/msg01425.ht...
That the project didn't include any talk of Java 9 in their new and noteworthy is, I believe, primarily the project lead trying to be careful about what claims we make about Java 9 support.
FWIW, you can test the Java 9 support BETA today.
http://marketplace.eclipse.org/content/eclipse-java%E2%84%A2...
I've changed how we generate those charts to make it easier for people to see activity without having to understand (and navigate) our (arcane?) project hierarchy.