|
|
|
|
|
|
by crucini
3926 days ago
|
|
|
OK, it does sound like CW misunderstood their own patent in an earlier filing. And maybe that technically makes them lose the point. But CW's current filing contains this: According to the patent, “The MAC-e PDU is sent to the physical layer every
n*TTI, instead of once every transmission time interval (TTI).” If the integer were to be 1,
the MAC-e PDU would be sent to the physical layer once every TTI, which is expressly
excluded by the specification.” In other words, the specification excludes the n=1 case, and the n<1 cases are nonsensical. |
|
|