|
|
|
|
|
by jabzd
3917 days ago
|
|
We are a 7 year old company. I have only ever had one candidate find a problem similar to the point you are making. Most understand that the risk profile makes a world of difference for a profitable company now versus 7 years ago where skipping payroll for the co-founders was common. Your math is slightly off in assuming that the .1-.25% carries for the bulk of the ten, but your point valid all the same as a potential concern for individuals. We often struggle with being labeled a startup due to our age and risk profile, but due to our size, we accept it! Ha. |
|
While I obviously don't know anything about what your company does and what its financials look like, if I was a prospective employee, the fact that you're sub 10 employees at seven years in would lead me to conclude that you're not the kind of high-growth company for which 0.1 - 0.25% equity has any chance of translating to a really big payout. So why pretend? I'd find it far more appealing if your compensation package was realistic/honest about where you're at as a company.