[dogma1138]

Corrupting an RSA employee sure, making a deal with a corporation for measly 10M nope.

Human assets is a different story, 1.4 and even 250K while not being a large sum is quite a large amount of money. Those assets are usually developed by other means, in most cases the money is largely irrelevant even if the asset refuses to take money tradecraft mandates that they'll be forced to take it it just to leave a money trail that they could then be threatened with if they no longer with to comply. Additionally being paid also makes the asset more invested in their duty because it creates a link like with a would be employer, and allows them to quantify their assignment with a positive reinforcement no matter how big or small it is. So money which is paid to long term assets isn't really a bribe, an initial sum might be used to turn the asset in the first place but it also usually require them to be in a position to need it e.g. gambling debts, medical bills etc. Generally assets that can be bribed will not be farmed in such manner as the cases you've mentioned, people that can be easily bribed cannot be trusted which isn't a trait you want in an asset.

[MichaelGG]

Eh are we sure the 10M was the only thing being paid? Perhaps the NSA sweetened the deal for key decision makers.

Even without that - it's free money for a benign reason, while doing the security services a favour. "Hey we've got this new crypto thing that's amazing but people don't believe us. Add it to your product, and we'll give you token compensation. Also we'll also make a note of what great guys you are."