|
|
|
|
|
by mbreese
6012 days ago
|
|
Yeah, but how many other people will be using it? You may be planning on using it for a decade, but you will be in a very small minority. And so to share the output (the very common and portable HTML), you need to add another step to your workflow to convert things. This just seems like too much effort for very little gain. |
|
You can see here that I've already solved the problem of sharing SHPAML output using HTML:
http://shpaml.webfactional.com/
You are right about it adding a step to my workflow. If only there was some kind of machine that could automate things for me...