|
|
|
|
|
|
by zo1
3940 days ago
|
|
|
>"So.. nanomsg is 10x faster. Why would one use nats?" The article comparing the performance of all those messaging systems conveniently "groups" them into two groups. Brokerless, and brokered. Putting Nats into the latter, despite it not sharing any of the main things that we are used to with a brokered system. I.e. Transactions and persistance. So, it's safe to say that in that context and those properties, there is no reason to use NATS over nanomsg. |
|
|