[anu_gupta]

Because right now, we can pay a one time fee and use the software as long as we want, without incurring any more cost in return for not getting updates or imposing a cost on JetBrains.

However, from November, that will no longer be possible. If Jetbrains decides, in 2016, to increase the license fee to $300 per year, or $500, then we will have 2 options: Pay it and continue to have access, or don't pay, and lose all access to the tools, despite the fact that we have already given you money. If I have a cashflow problem, I can no longer decide to stay with last year's version for a while, instead I lose access.

I'm sure you know this, I'm sure everyone at JetBrains knows this.

[microtonal]

If Jetbrains decides, in 2016, to increase the license fee to $300 per year, or $500,

Or even more likely (for an IDE that is ahead quite a lot): charge the same license fee, but don't supply any interesting new features.

This is one of my fundamental objections to the subscription model. In the perpetual license model, a company has to entice its customers every major version to shell out the money. How do you do this? By making the product even better. In the subscription model, that direct incentive is gone, the customer has to pay anyway.

[timv]

JetBrains admit as much in a comment on their blog:

> On the other hand, we think we’ll be able to concentrate on quality more than trying to impress users with new features so they buy upgrades. Our products are more than feature-full and we believe the quality is something that can always be improved.

Translation: We've run out of things that we think you'll actually want to pay for, so we've decided to force you to pay instead.

[microtonal]

It's really a shame :(, there's a lot of things that I can still think of, such as a decent Java profiler, a feature competing with JRebel (or far better DCEVM support), etc.

[s73v3r]

The license seems to say that if you stop paying, you can still use the most recent version as of when your subscription expired. So technically you could subscribe for one month, get the software, and keep using it until you saw a version that was compelling enough to upgrade to.

[masklinn]

That's the old licensing model: you had a perpetual license and 1 year worth of upgrade, you could buy more upgrades but if you didn't the last available version would keep working forever.

The whole point of the licensing change and the switch to a service is to remove the perpetual license. No money, no IDE.

[anu_gupta]

That's not how I'm reading it, and I'd be amazed if that was the case, because then, you literally could pay £6 and get PHPStorm to use forever.

[s73v3r]

That's according to a post earlier in the thread from the guy I presume is from JetBrains. It's also similar to the license Epic had for Unreal Engine, before they got rid of the monthly fee.

[anu_gupta]

You seem to be conflating the perpetual licence, which is what we have currently and will stop being available in November with the new subscription. If I do not move to the subscription model, I can continue to use my current version of PHPStorm, in perpetuity.

However, I cannot subscribe under the new terms, and keep using the software if I decide to stop subscribing. Earlier in this thread you suggested that we could subscribe for a month and keep using the software afterwards. This is incorrect. Once you stop subscribing, you lose the rights to use the software

[gorohoroh]

This is the licensing model that's used now, not the new one introduced in November.