|
|
|
|
|
by rsy96
3945 days ago
|
|
> An observer of the produced random numbers can potentially deduce the next numbers from the first 1024 random numbers. By definition, a cryptographically secure pseudorandom number generator cannot be predicted like that by a computationally bounded attacker. Thus if any attacker could deduce the next number from /dev/random by observing the numbers before, the algorithms they adopt is fundamentally wrong, and nothing could the save the security in that case. |
|