|
|
|
|
|
by fpj
3951 days ago
|
|
Thanks for your comments, and I'm sorry that you feel that the post does not match your expectation. If you write me directly, I'll be more than happy to clarify any question you may have. I'm not sure, for example, what is confusing you about the "zookeeper and consensus" section. I'm also not sure what kind of evidence you're after on published messages being lost. |
|
What I find vague in "ZooKeeper and consensus" is the answer to "Why does this proposal work compared to the original one?":
>> Because each of the workers has “proposed” a single value
Does the processes read or propose the value ?
>> and no changes to those values are supposed to occur.
Not suppose to ? How do you ensure that ?
>> Over time, as the configurator changes the value,
>> they can agree on the different values by running independent instances
>> of this simple agreement recipe.
Sorry, but I fail to see what recipe you speak about.