|
|
|
|
|
by shard
3957 days ago
|
|
How does writing it down make any difference, unless there was a corroborating witness during the conversation? It seems like it would still be he said she said. Is it just a case of writing it down being more unlikely for the memory of the words to be distorted by time passing? |
|
One theory: I guess because the journal commits you to one story. One consistent story is easy to shoot down, eg your neighbour claims and proves they were on holiday when your journal speaks of lots of noise.
Evidence that is easy to shoot down, but doesn't actually get shot down, is more believable afterwards.