Serious editor fail: the main subject of the article is an acronym used ~20 times without ever defining it. I know what it stands for, but I'm sure some readers were frustrated by that.
"Although MOOCs were hardly new in 2012—the term had been coined four years earlier by Canadian educators to describe their experiments with “connected,” open online learning— ..."
I suppose that passes as a basic explanation, but I agree that a better definition would be nice.
I suppose that passes as a basic explanation, but I agree that a better definition would be nice.