|
|
|
|
|
by coldtea
3962 days ago
|
|
>What the author ends up proposing, as usual, is basically RPC-over-JSON. Replace JSON with XML and RPC with SOAP, and you get the sort of monster-construct the REST movement was born to fight. No, you just get something like XML-RPC. Which was a great and cool solution in its time. Only even simpler in this case, since XML is replaced with JSON. Nothing to do with SOAP's faults (which were related to over-engineering and ridiculous volumes of specs) at all. RPC-over-JSON (using HTTP) is exactly what we need and what we want to do. Only we do it as "REST", complicating our lives trying to condense our endpoints to BS "HTTP verbs" that don't exactly match, and adding a separate off-band lane for status (HTTP STATUS codes) instead of having everything alonside the payload. |
|