[TheLoneWolfling]

Alright, this is yet another example of a title change that goes from a good title to a bad title.

If I hadn't have seen the article before the title was changed, I wouldn't have read it. "Utf8rewind changes for 1.2.1" isn't exactly the best title.

Please change it back (to "Utf8rewind 1.2.1 adds 750 new unit tests for its 13 functions"). That title actually indicates what is interesting about the article, and why it was submitted, not just "here's a random changelog for a random version of a random small library that no-one has ever even seen". HN's title policy seems to have become worse and worse over time, and this is a good (bad?) example thereof.