Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by thecabinet 3967 days ago
What clickbait pointlessness. We don't even really understand what causes GRBs, but they're calling this as feature? Why not call the ring much farther out in the picture a feature to? That seems only slight sillier.
3 comments

It's considered a feature I think not just because it's a ring but because it's an area of higher than expected density of Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs).
> They appear to be at very similar distances from us – around 7 billion light years – in a circle 36° across on the sky, or more than 70 times the diameter of the Full Moon. This implies that the ring is more than 5 billion light years across, and according to Prof Balazs there is only a 1 in 20,000 probability of the GRBs being in this distribution by chance.

I'd be interested to hear how they get this 1 in 20,000 figure.

Hint: it's in the paper.

> 4.2 Verification of the ring structure

They've identified a new largest structure - your high horse. Get off it.