|
> If A harms B, then your argument is that B has no right to retaliate it Yes and no. Yes, because no judgment allowed means no punishment allowed. But: the correct answer to A's action would be a sanction against A, in the sense that it would prevent A from harming again in the future. The wrong answers are: judgment, retaliation, punishment, revenge. > In other words, the world should just go on as it is It will. And it's also exactly what's happening here. > What is important, I think, like many other things, is the 'appearance' of having free will. Because without that, all life looses it's meaning. Not to worry, we'll always have this appearance, because causes and effects work on every macro and micro level. No system of sensors will ever be able to measure all variable, no model will ever be able to include all variables and no computer will ever be powerful enough to model everything. So, the magic remains. |