Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mirimir 3970 days ago
Maybe what's needed are better non-lethal weapons for police.
5 comments

Or better training and actual accountability. It's not like cops use tasers judiciously and intelligently.
Tasers are not all that non-lethal :(

Police ought to be part of the community, rather than some external paramilitary force. Their behavior would then be modulated through social mechanisms.

Also an excellent point. The selling of non-lethal weapons has been a several-decades long exercise in manufacturers lying about the safety of those non-lethal weapons. Rubber bullets, tasers, it's all bullshit.
Possibly.

But, another name for “non-lethal weapon” is “cheap and effective compliance tool”.

With those, we risk making many forms of protest and civil disobedience difficult or impossible.

That's not an issue, as long as police act lawfully, and laws allow protest and civil disobedience.
> as long as police act lawfully

I knew, there is a glitch!

How about using electro-magnetic waves to alter the brain function temporarily and provoke it to lose consciousness? Sounds like a hard technical challenge, but we can already deliver effective tranquilisants remotely and use electrical discharge to disable the central nervous system. Just find a more efficient way of doing that.
Ideally you would want some kind of sci-fi weapon that shoots out some sort of impenetrable web/blanket that wraps around the criminal, holding them until you can safely handle them at a later point.
I like the sticky-slime approach. I first read that in Snow Crash. Targets get glued to themselves and anything they touch. There's an enzyme that quickly degrades the adhesive.
It's mind boggling that a centuries old weapon is a supposition for any problem, let alone such a terribly serious one. It's likely that dog catchers are more advanced in their approach.