Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by dredmorbius 3976 days ago
It's less that capital is more important and more that it's inherently more concentrated, and hence, more capable of expressing its political will.

A dynamic pointed out quite explicitly by Adam Smith in Wealth of Nations.

1 comments

There's an economics term for this, though I'm spacing on the name. It's the same reason the taxi lobby is so strong - it's a subset of 1 issue voters with concentrated financial support of key issues. It's also behind why tax loopholes are so hard to close - a small subset cares a lot, but the masses less so.
There are several. Smith noted Hobbes's truism: wealth is power. You might be thinking of the logic of collective action, Mancur Olsen.
Yes - Mancur Olson it is. Thanks! It's more subtle than just Wealth is Power, as it also explains some counterintuitive results.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Logic_of_Collective_Action

Quite. A personal fave.