Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by asgard1024 3974 days ago
I disagree. There are examples and counterexamples on both sides. It's really hard to decide where the blame should go.

I am from Czech Republic, a former communist country. And it was nowhere as bad as Chile or El Salvador. Or, if you want just to compare Russian atrocities, occupation in 1968 was nowhere as bad as mass rapes in Germany after the end of world war, or Ukrainian famine, or Stalin's purges.

It's not just it's not black and white, it's not even one-dimensional. You can have regime without freedom of speech that puts couple tens people per year into jail (like Czech Republic in the 70s and 80s), or you can have a regime with freedom of speech that commits torture and war abroad, killing hundreds of people. To ask/answer which one is worse is meaningless.

And to compare it from economic perspective is just outright disgusting. Even if killing some people would indeed cause higher economic growth, no human should agree to such a trade.

1 comments

I'm from Romania, another former communist country from the Eastern block.

First of all you are comparing third world countries like Chile or El Salvador with European countries that were doing well before WWII. At least Romania was. This makes your comparison flawed, because when a country is somewhat rich, with a working middle class, with somewhat working institutions, it does have the resources to spare and it will still be doing OK.

Because of the Molotov–Ribbentrop pact between Hitler and Stalin, we've lost territories like Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina to the Soviet Union, by force of course. And I must say that this was happening in 1940, with a Romania that hadn't entered the war yet. Russians later blamed us for giving support to the Germans on their invasion, but that's why they say you reap what you sow. Bessarabia is now the republic of Moldova. We still think of them as being Bessarabia, as Moldova is also the name of the adjacent region in Romania.

After the war, the soviet induced famine has hit us as well, but it hit Moldavians much harder. Hundreds of thousands of people have died of hunger and the official numbers are actually lower than what happened (my grandfather lived to tell me the story). But furthermore, we had to pay war reparations. And during their invasion on our territory, they've established what are called Sovroms, which were enterprises meant to deplete the resources of our country, with the effect that we've paid much, much more than the war reparations that were demanded. The soviets also mined us, for example we've shipped thousands of tons of uranium ore which ended up being used in their atomic bomb project.

In Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina the soviets did what Russians do best when invading a territory. They arrested, executed or deported to labour camps in Siberia hundreds of thousands of people and they also planted Russians on those territories, with the purpose of completely destroying their national identity. And this strategy of theirs does wonders. In the eyes of many Moldavians, the Russians are their "brothers" and Romania has had a "colonial policy" that has to be terminated. In return we've started granting them dual citizenship that has been their gate to the EU. We wouldn't have any economic benefit in an eventual unification of course, the difference between Romania and the Republic of Moldova being the difference between western and eastern Germany in the eighties. This is why Ukraine is so divided btw, as this is their usual modus operandi and anybody that says Russia's actions there are justified is either an ignorant or full of shit.

But back to the soviets, in Romania the result was poverty of course. But as a fun fact, even our former communist government was anti-Russian. For example at some point under Ceaușescu we declined to place our military forces under the Warsaw Pact's joint command and we also refused to increase our military expenditures. We also refused to side with Russia on several political conflicts. And Romania was actually isolated from the rest of the Eastern block. We were the pariah of the Warsaw Pact. Our neighbors had it easier.

But by far the biggest damage that the soviets did to us is the mentality, which is the cause for the corrupted system we've inherited after the communist block fell. We've been recovering quite well, but it's far from over, being much like cancer extirpation. And while our brethren from around our country are sometimes giving signs of missing the USSR, we don't. In fact that's the reason I'm proud of my country - we've always been at the intersection of empires, we're still here, we're still speaking a romance language and we hate everybody :-)

"Bessarabia is now the republic of Moldova. We still think of them as being Bessarabia, as Moldova is also the name of the adjacent region in Romania."

Moldova is bigger than just "the adjacent region in Romania", Moldova is that and Bessarabia together. What's in Romania now is Moldova without Bessarabia.

I strongly agree with "damaging mentality", but we don't hate everybody! Nowadays we don't resent anyone other than the russians (with their wishful "sphere of influence" over us), and I hope that that will pass too.

True, never meant to say anything different.
> In return we've started granting them dual citizenship that has been their gate to the EU.

Not the best way to say "thank you" to the European Union -- not only do we have to suffer your Gypsies, we also get your Moldovans :(

(Don't put all the blame on the Soviets, the Ottomans didn't treat you so well, either.)

Funny, you don't seem to complain about the invasion of our engineers, software developers or doctors :-)

Also, we don't need to "thank you" dude, as the EU is not a charity, but a mutually beneficial arrangement. If it's not mutually beneficial, then we can negotiate, but don't give me this condescending attitude and we really don't have to apologize for giving citizenship to Moldavians or for having a gypsy minority. This is who we've always been and speaking of gipsies, we've been lectured for years in how we aren't doing a good job of integrating them in society. Well, here's your chance.

> (Don't put all the blame on the Soviets, the Ottomans didn't treat you so well, either.)

Yeah, no shit, we were amongst the ones that engaged the Ottomans in battle, helping in preventing their expansion into Europe. In 1475 for example our own Stephen the Great delivered what is said to be the greatest defeat of the ottomans until that time. He was then denied European assistance, yet he kept waging war until 1484. He was a Moldavian ;-)

I absolutely do apologize for the condescending attitude coming from Western Europe regarding the "oppressed gypsies" who were "totally good people who just never got a chance". It was wrong. They were and are more like parasites on better functioning peoples.

I was myself only briefly one of those Gutmenschen until I got hold of better data (which I actively sought and which were contradictory to everything I was taught in University).

On the other hand, this is pretty plonk-worthy:

> but don't give me this condescending attitude

and, yes, you probably should apologize for letting random Moldavians into the Schengen area.

All of the states in the Holy Roman Empire did pay extra taxes to pay for wars against the Ottomans a few decades later.

We aren't in the Schengen area, that's a different treaty. And we aren't letting in random Moldavians. Applying for citizenship still implies submitting an application for review, which includes things like a criminal record, birth certificates from parents and from grandparents as proof that they were Romanians, plus proof of legal residence in Romania for 48 months. The process is for "regaining citizenship", being easier than the full process. And no, we shouldn't apologize, our relationship with them is no secret, some of us also want the unification.