Not directly related to a consumer app, but I've found that requests for more features strongly predict customers who aren't going to pay.
Customers who are a good fit for the product ask for the core features to work better, faster, and in new situations you haven't thought of yet.
Customers who ask for random features are trying to think of use cases they want solved, because there are none being solved by the product as-is.
If most of your prospects are asking for random features, you don't have product-market fit. Try asking these customers to sign contracts saying they'll pay once the feature is supported. If they will, that's a promising pivot opportunity.
Simplicity is a great thing and the app screenshot looks nice. There must be something else to help persuade people to download this or explain the usefulness of its simplicity.
PS. WUT SENDS A MESSAGE TO ALL FRIEND WHO HAVE WUT.
Can you explain what kind of tone and audience you're targeting that made you decide to keep the typo? I'm genuinely interested because the phrase does sound odd to me.
If you were to look at a teenagers phone and ask "what does this word mean, and this word, and this word." That is our audience. Example: "OMG LOL FML" (clearly you know those words, but your parents may not)
Apple actually rejected our App the first time because our marketing copy was too ridiculous. This is the more reasonable version.
Customers who are a good fit for the product ask for the core features to work better, faster, and in new situations you haven't thought of yet.
Customers who ask for random features are trying to think of use cases they want solved, because there are none being solved by the product as-is.
If most of your prospects are asking for random features, you don't have product-market fit. Try asking these customers to sign contracts saying they'll pay once the feature is supported. If they will, that's a promising pivot opportunity.