Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
Think preprints are unreliable? Analysis of 70000 studies might change your mind (nature.com)
4 points by XzetaU8 20 days ago
2 comments

It's a very strange article. It's a strawman, the biggest problem is not that preprints that later get accepted and published are bad. The biggest problem is that some "preprints" are so bad that never get published.