Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
Hacker News but for Independent Blogs (bubbles.town)
36 points by headalgorithm 1 hour ago
5 comments

I think the links should open in the same window (like they do here on HN) instead of in a new tab/window. If I want a separate tab, I can Cmd+click and Browsers don't have the reverse option for opening in the same window.
nope, I prefer open in new tab by default
That's a good user setting, but as opening in the same tab is the default browser behaviour then it should really stay that way. Opening in a new tab takes control away from the user.
In general, it's better not to force an action onto users. You might prefer things opening in a new tab, but you always have that option. If it's forced on users, it is frustrating for those who would prefer that not to happen.
Very cool but I would like to be able to create an account with my mail address instead of using a Mastodon account because I am trying to avoid social media.
It looks like there's an RSS feed at the bottom. If you don't want to use the social aspects of the site, maybe just use that in an RSS reader?

*Link: https://bubbles.town/rss

The briefing pages also have RSS, this way you see the most relevant stuff https://bubbles.town/editions
I'm curios why you are avoiding social media?
Its a scam
Just curious but isn't this just digg, metafilter?
Bubbles dev here, thanks for the mention
how do you decide which blog is included in the aggregation?
You can find the criteria in the FAQ: https://bubbles.town/faq#sources
try about page, it explains
I'm curious: What software is driving this? Is it a re-skin of the lobste.rs or HN open source software, or is it its own thing?

EDIT: ...just realized that's in the FAQ.

> Is it open source?

> Not yet. Maybe someday.

It runs on Go + sqlite on a Hetzner machine, built from scratch, not a re-skin.
Clearly inspired by HN, there are few sites where I have to zoom in to get any kind of readability ;)
> not a re-skin

Is that something you're frequently accused of, or why the "disclaimer"?

They were directly answering the post above which asked if it's a re-skin.
The comment they were replying to specifically asked if it was a re-skin.
Ah yes of course, finally paid the price of reading comments in isolation. Thanks and sorry :)
Not really, I just picked it up from the initial question from stakhanov.
I love it!