| We’ve been programming devices by telling them what to do. But what if a device could be defined just by answering questions? Instead of writing code, you describe:
- what the device should do
- under what conditions it is allowed
- what should never happen From those answers, a real Matter device is generated (ESP32-C6). An action-first system where devices are defined, validated, and then executed. It’s not just no-code. Devices are not programmed — they are defined. GitHub:
https://github.com/anna-soft/Nemo-Anna If you want to try the flow directly:
https://anna.software I’d really appreciate feedback, especially on:
- whether this model makes sense
- where it breaks in real-world use
- how it could work with AI controlling physical devices |
Commands don’t give control.
Defining conditions does.
Curious how others think about this — especially when AI starts interacting with physical systems.