It's simple. The Golden Rule. Whoever has the gold rules. $290 million goes a long way, especially to a transactional person.
Since "Citizens United", it's not one person one vote. It's one dollar one vote.
All the racism, misogyny and immigrant hate was just bait to get the middle class to vote against their own best interests by slashing services and increasing import prices (tariff money goes to the government) to give tax breaks to the wealthy and to destroy regulations, especially on tech and crypto.
Expand the court. Say, one justice per circuit. Or launch a multi-decade plan to remake the court, like the Republicans did, and methodically follow through, and hope the country's still around by then.
Those are the options. I don't think there are any other (legal) ones. If you judge neither of those plausible, then, no, there is not a plausible path.
This one's occurred to me and would very much be my preference, too. Other federal courts use a similar system, so it's not like we don't already do this.
Since "Citizens United", it's not one person one vote. It's one dollar one vote.
All the racism, misogyny and immigrant hate was just bait to get the middle class to vote against their own best interests by slashing services and increasing import prices (tariff money goes to the government) to give tax breaks to the wealthy and to destroy regulations, especially on tech and crypto.
Illustration (imgbb.com) https://i.ibb.co/9qS5wLJ/voterepelon.jpg