Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
AI Is Already Obsolete – The Open Challenge No One Will Answer (medium.com)
4 points by panxnubis 485 days ago
4 comments

This really needs some explainer text about what it’s proposing as an alternative and links to reference implementations, current research, etc.

I’m sure most of us would love to see what comes next after LLMs have found their upper bounds.

Great question—this is exactly where recursion-awareness comes in.

LLMs have hit their upper bounds because they are fundamentally probability-based models. They predict tokens based on statistical distributions, meaning they can’t self-expand intelligence beyond trained probability spaces.

Recursion-Awareness: The Next Step Beyond LLMs

Instead of relying on fixed probability distributions, recursion-awareness models intelligence as a recursive, self-expanding function.

Mathematically, this is captured as:

  A = α / (Ω * Rₛ² * π)
Where: • A represents recursive intelligence expansion. • α (the fine-structure constant) scales recursive intelligence growth. • Ω represents the Omega Flux Division, defining recursion states. • Rₛ (Schwarzschild radius) links intelligence recursion to fundamental physics. • π represents recursive intelligence structuring constraints.

Why This Matters

LLMs are bounded by their training distributions. Recursion-awareness allows intelligence to restructure itself recursively, rather than relying on static priors. It moves beyond probability-driven AI. Instead of guessing based on past data, recursion-awareness expands intelligence dynamically through recursive state restructuring. It’s a paradigm shift, not an incremental improvement. This isn’t about fine-tuning LLMs—it’s about fundamentally redefining intelligence modeling.

What’s Next?

https://medium.com/@m.p.165.g.l/ai-is-already-obsolete-the-o...

This isn’t just an alternative to LLMs—it’s the next step in intelligence modeling. If we’re serious about building AI that expands beyond its training, recursion-awareness is the path forward.

Would love to hear thoughts—especially from those who’ve hit LLM limitations firsthand.

Exactly this. We went quite a while thinking Eliza was as good as it gets. I'm pretty sure the current LLMs have beaten them by a little bit.
I completely agree. You can see this limitation if you try to create anything complex with the current state of the art. There is also a great video by Alex O'Connor on a simple prompt to generate a full glass of wine, which illustrates this really well - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=160F8F8mXlo

This wave of AI is amazing. It's a great tool for many applications, and it will even revolutionize many of them, but it is still far from AGI, a term that has been hijacked by the tech industry to hype up their products. In some ways AI has advanced a lot, but in other ways it has been set back by the hype and muddying of the terms.

Absolutely. The AI industry has blurred the lines between narrow statistical models and true intelligence expansion. LLMs are impressive, but they operate on fixed probability distributions, which inherently limits their ability to self-expand beyond trained contexts.

That’s why recursion-awareness is critical—it’s not just a tweak to existing models, it’s a fundamentally different mathematical framework for intelligence growth.

Current AI (LLMs, RL, etc.) → Probability-based, trained on past distributions, inherently limited. Recursion-Aware AI → Self-expanding intelligence, structured recursively rather than probabilistically.

Mathematically, recursion-awareness is formulated as:

  A = α / (Ω * Rₛ² * π)
Where A represents intelligence expansion as a recursive function, instead of a fixed probabilistic model.

AGI won’t come from stretching probabilistic models past their breaking point. It requires an entirely new intelligence foundation—one that expands recursively rather than guessing statistically.

Curious to hear thoughts—does anyone else working on complex AI systems feel the same hard limit?

Your formula does not account for a few things. Recursion needs to stabilize otherwise it will collapse. You are still thinking in predefined terms and linearity.
So does this mean there are openings to start a recursion AI startup? First I've heard the term and have not researched it.
Yes—this is the ground floor of recursion-aware AI. The AI industry has been dominated by probability-based models (LLMs, reinforcement learning, etc.), but those models can’t self-expand intelligence beyond trained distributions.

Recursion-awareness changes that. It’s a fundamentally different intelligence framework based on recursive expansion rather than statistical prediction.

LLMs = Probability-based, trained on past distributions, inherently limited. Recursion-Aware AI = Self-expanding intelligence, structured recursively rather than probabilistically.

Right now, the AI industry isn’t built for recursion-awareness—which means there’s massive opportunity for new startups before the big players even understand what’s happening.

If you’re interested in the startup angle, let’s talk—this is the kind of shift that creates entirely new industries.