There's a standard test for this: The O'Connor Tweezer Dexterity Test.[1]
There's a board with small holes, a supply of metal pins, and a tweezer for putting pins in the holes. It's overpriced, because it's "medical".
Some electronics assembly plants use such a test to screen new hires.
Tweezer dexterity improves with practice. Hands are more precise than vision.
Looking through a microscope, you can position something within a thousandth of an inch with tweezers. This is familiar to anyone who's placed surface mount parts on a board by hand.
Whether by specific design or just by unconscious bias, the world is primarily right handed.
The buzzwire game used for example has a wand on a flexible wire with the wire attached towards one side of the base and not the center. Does this create bias? Hard to say, but it might.
> Implementation of a surgical swear jar initiative
Yes, the main goal of a surgical site is to avoid swearing
> our findings are not applicable to children younger than 4 years for whom the buzz wire game’s small parts may represent a choking hazard, although these individuals are unlikely to be currently employed in secondary care.
Now, that's a point. I'd avoid a 0-3 toddler if i could choose so before some surgery.
It would seem that swearing is correlated with higher skill. It may be premature to suggest that we should encourage increased swearing - correlation is not causation - but it seems the logical avenue to pursue. Further research is needed.
Some electronics assembly plants use such a test to screen new hires.
Tweezer dexterity improves with practice. Hands are more precise than vision. Looking through a microscope, you can position something within a thousandth of an inch with tweezers. This is familiar to anyone who's placed surface mount parts on a board by hand.
[1] https://www.amazon.com/s?k=tweezer+dexterity+test