I see there's the usual squabbling in the comments over the question of increase in disasters, or cost of. Last I checked, even if you gauge natural disasters in the absolute sense rather than in terms of $ in damage, they increased. It's neither here nor there, if experts broadly agree on that point and others then you're just calling them liars, while eschewing the burden of dissecting the data.
I see there's the usual squabbling in the comments over the question of increase in disasters, or cost of. Last I checked, even if you gauge natural disasters in the absolute sense rather than in terms of $ in damage, they increased. It's neither here nor there, if experts broadly agree on that point and others then you're just calling them liars, while eschewing the burden of dissecting the data.