Here, it looks like Zig doesn’t allow for a way to describe the distinction.
Would it be better if the types defined by structure automatically were assigned a very ugly name isomorphic to the structure ?
https://ziglang.org/documentation/master/#typeInfo
https://ziglang.org/documentation/master/#TypeOf
https://ziglang.org/documentation/master/#Keyword-Reference
Here, it looks like Zig doesn’t allow for a way to describe the distinction.
Would it be better if the types defined by structure automatically were assigned a very ugly name isomorphic to the structure ?