If I were a far-right provocateur, I would claim to burn a Koran but have it be an empty book. Or simply burn a book without saying what the book contains.
Or, if the ban is on burning a religious text, I would use a paper shredder, or chain saw, or drive nails through it.
> “History has taught Jews what can come next when you start burning books,”
I'm from the US, where book burning is surprisingly common.
A college roommate of mine was one - he burned his SF/fantasy books after a visiting preacher to his religious group encouraged them to get rid of an earthly thing they loved, to spend more time with God.
There's been several Harry Potter burnings, like "In 2001, people held a bonfire in New Mexico to burn the [Harry Potter] books because they believed the novels perpetuated the idea of satanism." - https://www.polygon.com/2017/2/1/14474054/harry-potter-books...
Yeah, that "far-right provocateur" is single-handedly doing all the burning, the guys who actually set the property of others to fire are just victims of his "hate crime".
Literally no one in the article is making that argument. It even says "People who are appalled by Paludan’s actions are nevertheless disturbed by the widespread violence in response to them."
They want it to be made illegal so the police can stop people from burning the Koran and other religious texts.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/sweden-riots-over-quran... says "police said at least 34 people were arrested in Linkoping and Norrkoping after about 150 demonstrators threw stones at officers and set vehicles ablaze." - they aren't being treated as victims.
> Literally no one in the article is making that argument.
I meant that as sarcasm (note the headline), but IMO, the article is clearly more sympathetic towards people who "set vehicles ablaze" than the guy who seems to have at worst burnt a book as an effigy.
> They want it to be made illegal so the police can stop people from burning the Koran and other religious texts.
I don't think that's a good idea at all. That's essentially just a form of a blasphemy law.
I read the headline as following a similar construction as descriptions of how Gavrilo Princip triggered the First World War. Eg, from a DDG search I easily found:
] If you have an image in your head of a notorious assassin or terrorist, Gavrilo Princip is probably the last person on your mind. ... you'd be hard pressed to believe this poseur had any chance of setting the world's economic and political center on fire. - https://mida.org.il/2014/06/28/shots-started-first-world-war...
That doesn't mean Princip literally set the world on fire, nor is it sympathetic towards Princip nor Serbian nationalism.
> That's essentially just a form of a blasphemy law.
I concur. But it's not an effective counter-argument since those who want such a law will make exactly the same argument. "This is just a form of blasphemy law like Finland and Germany already have." (I don't know the specifics of those two countries, only that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_law describes them as having blasphemy laws.)
A blasphemy law will do nothing to stop the actual issue in Sweden, which is the failure of its migration policy and integration. Riots like this are just one symptom, massive gang-related gun violence is another. But nobody cares since it's mostly concentrated to poorer suburbs, just like in the US.
Eventually people will care though. As the share of marginalized population keeps growing, the issues will spread to new areas until even the richest are not safe. Maybe Sweden will be like South Africa, with gated communities and private security.
FWIW, also mentioned in the article, quoting Swedish newspaper columnist Oisin Cantwell:
> “One of the reasons we’re seeing those riots is the government’s failed integration and immigration policies,” he argues. “The murder rate has gone up and the criminal gangs are killing each other. But I’m not sure that copying Denmark’s strict immigration policies is the right answer,” he adds, referring to the country’s relatively hard-line approach to accepting migrants.
1) Paludan literally set copies of the Koran on fire.
2) Paludan's actions triggered consequences that, among other things, led to setting a school on fire and greater distruction. This does not mean that Paludan directly set the school on fire.
We know this because we can look how others use the same phrase, like how Gavrilo Princip set the world on fire [1] when he killed Ferdinand, even though the only thing he fired was was two shots from a gun, or when "a young Tunisian fruit vendor named Mohamad Bouazizi set himself and the Arab world on fire, igniting the Arab Spring across North Africa, the Middle East and the Persian Gulf. "[2]
3) "ablaze" can also mean "feeling or showing strong emotion, especially anger", quoting https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/ablaze . In this case, there are strong emotion both for and against the idea of a ban on burning religious texts.
BTW, you could use a text-mode browser or curl to get around the paywall - that's what I did.
If I were a far-right provocateur, I would claim to burn a Koran but have it be an empty book. Or simply burn a book without saying what the book contains.
Or, if the ban is on burning a religious text, I would use a paper shredder, or chain saw, or drive nails through it.
> “History has taught Jews what can come next when you start burning books,”
I'm from the US, where book burning is surprisingly common.
"Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, church youth groups coordinated book burnings and music bonfires to purge their world of evil art." points out https://religionnews.com/2020/06/17/evangelicals-perfected-c... .
A college roommate of mine was one - he burned his SF/fantasy books after a visiting preacher to his religious group encouraged them to get rid of an earthly thing they loved, to spend more time with God.
Here's a pastor recently "encouraging parishioners to toss books like "Harry Potter" and "Twilight" into a fire to denounce what he described as "demonic" materials. " - https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pastor-holds-bonfire-bu...
There's been several Harry Potter burnings, like "In 2001, people held a bonfire in New Mexico to burn the [Harry Potter] books because they believed the novels perpetuated the idea of satanism." - https://www.polygon.com/2017/2/1/14474054/harry-potter-books...
In Poland too! https://people.com/books/harry-potter-books-burned-by-polish...
It seems that what can come next when you start burning books is have some Hollywood movies made about the books.
BTW, if people really believe the Harry Potter books are Satanic, then doesn't that make them religious texts?