The legal argument against a subpoena, such as it were, rests on the Constitution’s speech-or-debate clause, which states that “for any Speech or Debate in either House,” members of Congress “shall not be questioned in any other Place” (emphasis added).
The clause dates back to 1689’s English Bill of Rights, which was designed to prevent the monarchy from using criminal and civil laws to bully legislators critical of the Crown.
The Democrats are attacking their opponents for challenging the results of the election, something that has occurred after every election by both sides for time and memorial.
I wonder how much longer they are going to try and make hay from Jan 6th? Probably right up until the midterms which is over a year away.
But it's not my fight anyways, I live in Canada now and we are going into our own election which will probably result in our own set of challenges, big lies and inquiries as canadian politicians seem to mirror the US political attack strategy.
As far as I understand, these aren't speeches in either house. Nevertheless, what if a member of Congress incited violence with his speeches? Should be he go as nothing happened? Is there really no limits?
> The Democrats are attacking their opponents for challenging the results of the election, something that has occurred after every election by both sides for time and memorial.
You think a mob has invaded the capitol building every election?
Or look at it another way: if Biden loses in 2024, how far should he be allowed to go in order to overthrow the election?
How far did Trump go to overthrow it? You seem to think it's all Trumps fault that a mob of people that spent a summer watching people riot all across america looting and burning down buildings...without any concequences, show up at the capitol to protest, get carried away then riot, and bust into the capitol.
Trump probably did enjoy watching congress cowar in fear and flee, but in the end he told them to go home, he didn't say "now I'm incharge". You only think that way because the sleazy media propagandists have told You to think that.
Maybe You shoukd try looking at it another way, or don't ignorance is bliss after all.
I mean I'd consider organizing a coup to stop the peaceful transfer of power would certainly be considered a crime. Especially when some of the members are actively planning t have another go at it(https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/politics-government/a...)
Yes indeed that would be a terrible crime. I am so glad it was not achieved, the US is fortunate that the government was able to fight off the insurectionists and lock up all those awful people.
Although, a simmilar situation took place in Hong Kong but I guess those terrorist were on the right side of freedom, right?
I really don't care what's happening outside the borders. It's pretty irrelevant. All I care about is a certain party here organized a coup and now threatening private players of dire consequences if they followed through with the subpoena.
If the Democrats really believe that their opponents organized a coup then the US has bigger problems ahead.
It is possible that the Republican members encouraged a political protest that unfortunately turned violent and got out of hand but that is not a coup and is no worse than the Democrats fundraising to bail out BLM rioters.
I wouldn't be supprised if Congress awards themselves medals for surviving the "Great Insurection of Jan 6th." What a bunch of calamity callers.
But I did discover that he holds a Bachelor of Science in Marketing. How the fuck is Marketing part of the Science faculty?