And those videos could not have been produced to get clicks?
The guy talks about geometry but makes assumptions that reinforce his beliefs. And yea, one you make an assumption that you worked out to support your theory then you can also work it out the other way around to "prove" your theory.
Everyone one of these videos guesses for some values need to be made since the readouts on the display are missing information you would need to be certain of speed of the object.
The values you use can make the object seem ordinary or extraordinary. Once you set the values for your desired outcome you can present your case any way you wish and the numbers will just work out the way you wanted them to.
Like everyone else, I was initially skeptical when I first heard about these supposed "UFOs". However, in the face of all these observations from government agencies, I've been wavering a bit. Is there any reasonable chance these objects actually are extraterrestrial in origin? If not, what can they be? Drones? Experimental aircraft? If so, who is making them?
Why would UFOs imply extraterrestrial origin? It's the least likely explanation for them being there by a wide margin. They're just unidentified flying objects, in the literal sense of the acronym.
In this particular case the media UFO hype machine seems to have discovered a case of bokeh[0].
[0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-r2oaQWmqkk