I know products like this are ubiquitous but I really like the response one gets. Kudos on launching!
The pricing, however, is a little confusing. A seemingly very-generous free-tier (though the "Up to 250,000 IP requests / mo" is a little confusing, what dictates whether one gets the full quota?) and the next tier-up at 250$/m is a bit too rich for my blood. Wouldn't it make more sense to have some in-between tier where you charge per 1000s of requests or something? I fear the jump will preclude people from going to the 'Pro' tier.
Thanks a lot @somada141! Apologies for any confusion.
Let me clarify: the Free tier covers the first 250k API requests made in a single month. If the number of requests in a month goes beyond the threshold, the API will start returning Forbidden errors. The counter gets reset at the first of each month.
If your service gets more than 250k hits a month, then you will be a perfect match for our "Pro" tier.
This pricing structure, puts us on a league of our own, offering to the developers a huge package of free API calls every single month. Nobody else does it!
Hm a 403 when one runs out of credit can be misleading as one would expect that for an authorization error. You may want to consider the `402 Payment Required` status code instead which seems to be used by some big players [0].
It is - if you compare the sites it looks like ipinfo.io is doing a grab for a multi-branded approach by changing the design of the site up JUST enough so it looks like another org.
Would have been cool if it gave the actual type of the company as a result. Like if someone from Toys R Us visits your page, you could give them a retail use case front and center. Is that planned?
That's a very good point. We constantly try to improve the data accuracy of our API. We currently support the following company types: "education", "isp", "hosting", "government", "business". We also expose the domain assigned to the ASN of the IP currently looked up, this would probably give you enough info to implement the logic you are suggesting.
Good question. Only 3 points. User has 6 karma and is only 65 days old. And there are other posts around the same time with more votes on /newest that aren't on the front page.
At first I thought it may have been a second-chance resubmission by a moderator[0], but it has a recent submission id so that's probably not it.
I guess one of the other two points came from someone with a lot of karma, or there's not a lot of new posts right now?