The premise is flawed. It would take more than popularity for Facebook or Amazon to become a monopoly but they would need to engage in illegal action protective of their market share. It's not illegal to be a monopoly; it's illegal to abuse one's monopoly position. When a competitor to Facebook, Amazon, etc is only a few mouse clicks away then seriously calling any digital property a monopoly is a stretch.
And this ignores that online monopolies don't seem to last very long anyway (Friendster, MySpace, Yahoo...).
And this ignores that online monopolies don't seem to last very long anyway (Friendster, MySpace, Yahoo...).