This may be a minor nitpick, or it may be unwarranted entirely, but is the discourse of broadband protections being "revoked/rolled back/taken away" even accurate? It's been my understanding that the rules governing consumer broadband privacy weren't even on the books at all, and weren't planned to be for quite some time.
Have I been misunderstanding this aspect of this story, and if so-does anyone have substantive reading material that I can go educate myself on?
Granted, the issue has done a good job exposing more evidence of the 'Our politicians have been bought and paid for' and other problems of broadband regulation.
Have I been misunderstanding this aspect of this story, and if so-does anyone have substantive reading material that I can go educate myself on?
Granted, the issue has done a good job exposing more evidence of the 'Our politicians have been bought and paid for' and other problems of broadband regulation.